Clevo M980NU

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Clevo M980NU (all builds)
Motherboard	CLEVO M980NU
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090515
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '17 at 09:42
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P9700 485 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 479, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Memory 75.3 1-Core 40.1 2-Core 79.6 43% 65 Pts	4-Core 76.1 8-Core 78.7 10% 77.4 Pts	64-Core 78.4 5% 78.4 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 280M 161 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Clevo(1558 9800) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	6.67% Terrible	Lighting 9.2 Reflection 8.19 Parallax 3.47 8% 6.95 fps	MRender 7.05 Gravity 6.57 Splatting 5.35 5% 6.32 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.67% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 211GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 8 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 61 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 84118351	52.7% Above average	Read 265 Write 180 Mixed 200 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 35 4K Mixed 30.6 94% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 23 DQ Write 31.9 DQ Mixed 13.9 14% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 124%
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40 13,598 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 298GB free Firmware: 0002SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 139421635 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1538 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 5 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 85534327 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2061 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 37 1530 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 3 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 47 588644387 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 14 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 10073 (C2) HDA temperature 35 53 64424509475 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 56 48 139421635 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -125516124256197 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1527840691 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1983827085 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	50.2% Above average	Read 88.6 Write 86.3 Mixed 82.2 64% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.39 87% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 51%
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40 13,598 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 298GB free Firmware: 0002SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 91779812 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1530 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 7786350 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2092 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 37 1530 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032834 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 49 571801634 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 80 80 40008 (C2) HDA temperature 34 51 60129542178 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 58 53 91779812 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 15 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -89850715831603 (F1) Unknown 100 253 50357604 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1064012612 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	49.2% Average	Read 88.3 Write 83.2 Mixed 78.5 63% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.44 93% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5.3 17% 5.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.3 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 89.7 45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Clevo M980NU

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)