PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | MSI MS-7673 |
Motherboard | MSI P67A-C43 (MS-7673) (all builds) |
Memory | 21 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120222 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 09 '17 at 05:59 |
Run Duration | 341 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.4%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.86
|
53%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
51.3%
Above average
|
|||
TOSHIBA MK6459GSX 640GB
132GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
10.6%
Very poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG HM320II 320GB
43GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
|||
General UDisk 2GB
0GB free, PID null
|
6.58%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.5%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 104x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 61x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 48x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 29x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 19x |
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 13x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $826 |