Sony VPCZ13M9E

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Sony VPCZ13M9E (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100730
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '17 at 13:37
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	44.8% Average	Memory 62.5 1-Core 64.3 2-Core 118 49% 81.4 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 160 21% 159 Pts	64-Core 167 10% 167 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sony(104D 905A) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.16.11.9024 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	2.2% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 0.78 2% 2.26 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 1.83 Splatting 2.87 3% 3.28 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.2% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Volume0 128GB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: UDMA 33 33 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Read 273 Write 303 Mixed 289 65% 289 MB/s	4K Read 14.9 4K Write 22.5 4K Mixed 15.3 54% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 36.9 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 26 33% 57 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 61%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$60 4,559 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 429GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 172 170 2375 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4443 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3646 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3108 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 54 572194850 (BF) G-sense error rate 67 67 33 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 240 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 178 178 67592 (C2) HDA temperature 113 101 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	57.6% Above average	Read 103 Write 97 Mixed 95.3 74% 98.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.42 112% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.3% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 10.4 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16