Asus H61M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-C (all builds)
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '17 at 20:01
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1620-$45 2,566 User benchmarks, average bench 49% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 89.4 1-Core 75 2-Core 144 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 149 20% 150 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 844D) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2884 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.55% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.58 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.49 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 1 Splatting 3.17 2% 2.41 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.55% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7405 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2394 (B1) Unknown 98 98 22 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 60 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 17 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13267464026
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 371GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 138 137 4091 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4970 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17003 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4961 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 88 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4881 (C2) HDA temperature 113 97 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	62.6% Good	Read 111 Write 107 Mixed 58.9 68% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.41 108% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 69%
WD My Book 1140 2TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 666GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 94.9 Write 95.7 Mixed 75.7 113% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.91 4K Mixed 0.14 37% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 49%
ST310005 20AS 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 627GB free, PID null Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 93.4 Write 93.8 Mixed 27.2 85% 71.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.48 60% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1600KLN-4G 1x4GB 355 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	29.8% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.7 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 10 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-C Builds (Compare 757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-C - $105

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	109x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	86x
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples	77x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	117x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	51x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	32x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	21x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	16x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	11x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $192

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16