Supermicro X9DRL-3F/iF

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9DRL-3F/iF (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DRL-3F/iF
Memory	123.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150922
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '17 at 19:39
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	GEO-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 398 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 71.1 1-Core 72.8 2-Core 144 56% 96.1 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 573 51% 429 Pts	64-Core 1,568 97% 1,568 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% MSI(1462 2821) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	33.9% Below average	Lighting 40.5 Reflection 39.1 Parallax 51.2 33% 43.6 fps	MRender 50.1 Gravity 46.4 Splatting 37.1 36% 44.5 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14099 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 556 (B1) Unknown 98 98 79 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 39 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 90 (F1) Unknown 99 99 38338750005	85.4% Excellent	Read 510 Write 470 Mixed 490 110% 490 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 29.6 89% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 76.8 86% 147 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 136GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 2776085 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -85787676769870 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 11 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 3 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 26 55 51543212058 (C2) HDA temperature 26 55 51543212058 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2776085 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2776085 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2776085 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4294963405 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2031639	47.3% Average	Read 251 Write 190 Mixed 199 47% 213 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 16.6 64% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 99.7 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 53.9 63% 107 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 85%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 5.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 185 100 9725 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 65 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 24 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 52 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 100 26 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 100 38 (C2) HDA temperature 122 121 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0
Poor: 61% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 516GB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 177154976 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1687 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 4359006866 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 17050 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1641 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 48 487981085 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 412 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 64 64 73603 (C2) HDA temperature 29 52 51539607581 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -65107409227352 (F1) Unknown 100 253 89047137432 (F2) Unknown 100 253 110701436735	73.3% Very good	Read 130 Write 126 Mixed 101 89% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 0.79 4K Mixed 0.16 44% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 80GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 158 157 7083 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4712 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 14693 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2013 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 308 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 187 187 39943 (C2) HDA temperature 122 98 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.6% Above average	Read 102 Write 81.7 Mixed 83.6 67% 88.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.16 62% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0- 8x16GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	MC Read 53.6 MC Write 23.7 MC Mixed 25.9 98% 34.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 5.4 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 98.9 40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DRL-3F/iF Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 49%

Yacht

System: Supermicro X9DRL-3F/iF

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v21stBench 63%, 551 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	3x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	2x

SSD
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	2x
TA1D0240A 240GBGalaxBench 69%, 2,348 samples	2x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2K70CM0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 77%, 51 samples	2x
HMT31GR7CFR4C 4x8GBHynixBench 80%, 107 samples	1x
M393B1K70DH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 95%, 162 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $117

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16