PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Medionpc MS-7667 (all builds) |
Motherboard | MEDIONPC MS-7667 |
Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110321 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Mar 05 '17 at 14:42 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
|
78.8%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
51.3%
Above average
|
|||
76.6%
Very good
|
||||
WD Elements 500GB
273GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
40.6%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273DH0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1333 MHz
|
49.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 4x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $581 |