PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | ECS A890GXM-A (all builds) |
Memory | 17.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100324 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Mar 03 '17 at 19:31 |
Run Duration | 180 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 85% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
51.7%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.8.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
13.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
71.5%
Very good
|
||||
95.9%
Outstanding
|
||||
55.6%
Above average
|
||||
53.1%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM
|
27%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 2x |
Phenom II X6 1075TAMD $254Bench 56%, 4,420 samples | 1x |
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples | 3x |
R7 260XAMD $120Bench 20%, 38,521 samples | 1x |
Radeon HD 5670AMDBench 6%, 18,196 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $172 |