Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory61.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '17 at 16:17
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 175
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 696
62% 522 Pts
64-Core 1,786
111% 1,786 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4990) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.9% Very good
Lighting 97.4
Reflection 100
Parallax 90.9
79% 96.2 fps
MRender 86
Gravity 88.7
Splatting 80.1
69% 85 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 489
Write 393
Mixed 402
95% 428 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 18.9
111% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 58
57% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 134%
Mushkin ECO2 SMI 512GB-$80
68GB free
Firmware: N1007C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.1% Above average
Read 262
Write 247
Mixed 254
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 15.6
76% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 14.5
56% 122 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 97%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
65GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.8% Good
Read 263
Write 207
Mixed 214
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 25.9
97% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 13.7
55% 123 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
707GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 155
Write 125
Mixed 123
101% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.19
82% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate Backup+ Desk Mac 2TB
1.5TB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 121
Write 158
Mixed 138
185% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.21
45% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70PH0-YK 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
109% Outstanding
MC Read 58.1
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 35.9
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $373
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback