Gigabyte GA-P55-US3L

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55-US3L (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.5 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '17 at 19:01
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 95.6 1-Core 96.3 2-Core 192 76% 128 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 382 44% 344 Pts	64-Core 383 24% 383 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Palit(1569 13C2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.4% Above average	Lighting 62.8 Reflection 66.4 Parallax 58.3 51% 62.5 fps	MRender 72 Gravity 59.3 Splatting 52.3 49% 61.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP920 256GB-$203 2,823 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4950 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2132 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 96 96 129 (AE) Unknown 100 100 44 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 49 219044577319 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 16 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 9545 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 96 96 4 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 19019952778 (F7) Unknown 100 100 600605679 (F8) Unknown 100 100 1537715656	46.6% Average	Read 267 Write 253 Mixed 259 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 54.4 4K Mixed 11.2 64% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14.7 DQ Write 61.3 DQ Mixed 52 36% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 99%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 283GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 125 125 12896895161 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 50 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 93 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 50 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 50 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 50 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 197569937445 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 93	66.1% Good	Read 121 Write 109 Mixed 128 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.98 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.19 97% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 107%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 276GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 228 1166 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8053 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 15199 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7883 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 199 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8050 (C2) HDA temperature 107 98 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.2% Average	Read 75.2 Write 71.7 Mixed 76.8 56% 74.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.36 90% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 15.5 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 15.6 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 55.3 72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55-US3L Builds (Compare 296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-US3L

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	104x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	44x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	15x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples	13x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	53x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	43x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $169

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16