Asus G750JS

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Asus G750JS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G750JS
Memory	23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140717
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '17 at 07:56
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370 42,062 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 81 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 161 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 505 51% 413 Pts	64-Core 503 31% 503 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 157D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3574 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.43% Terrible	Lighting 4.83 Reflection 28.3 Parallax 6.72 4% 13.3 fps	MRender 9.38 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 7.7 5% 6.51 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.43% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 512GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 259 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 60 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 52 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 5 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1281550399	94.2% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 407 Mixed 218 83% 377 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 77.9 4K Mixed 35 148% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 42 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 101 76% 97.6 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 283GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2708 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 809 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 43 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 19 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9437188336	97.5% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 404 Mixed 288 88% 399 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 75.3 4K Mixed 35.6 144% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 102 101% 165 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 134%
SDHC Card 16GB 8,111 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 12GB free, PID null Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 80.8 Write 12.5 Mixed 17.7 34% 37 MB/s	4K Read 6.69 4K Write 0.74 4K Mixed 0.95 82% 2.79 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 99U5428-018.A00LF Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 32GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.9% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 15.8 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 19.3 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G750JS Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JS

CPU
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	206x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	114x
Core i7-4712HQIntelBench 61%, 5,396 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	204x
GTX 870MNvidiaBench 22%, 3,247 samples	117x

SSD
mSATA SD5SE2256G1002E 256GBSanDiskBench 71%, 860 samples	26x
X110 256GBSanDisk $100Bench 79%, 4,989 samples	16x
RBU-SC100S37128GD 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 1,846 samples	9x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 22,647 samples	79x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	26x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16