Asrock Z77 Professional

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Professional (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120713
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 01 '17 at 12:52
Run Duration	441 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 102 2-Core 188 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 488 55% 429 Pts	64-Core 492 30% 492 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	113% Outstanding	Lighting 144 Reflection 189 Parallax 175 117% 169 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 175 Splatting 121 114% 141 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 6966940 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 46935402625939 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1302 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 41 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 27 39 64427065371 (C2) HDA temperature 27 39 64427065371 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 6966940 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 6966940 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 6966940 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 93 93 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 34438 (EA) Unknown 0 0 96748 (F1) Unknown 0 0 96748 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9160	34.4% Below average	Read 188 Write 101 Mixed 111 29% 133 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 42.6 4K Mixed 9.69 57% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 76.6 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 28.4 39% 70.2 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 332GB free Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 147597256 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2614 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 57 8681073778 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 15465 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1353 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 2 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 72 59 4766171164 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 37 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 20 20 161737 (C2) HDA temperature 28 41 -140737488355300 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -110732846817736 (F1) Unknown 100 253 76433277789 (F2) Unknown 100 253 47649399602	93.2% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 159 Mixed 149 119% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.25 78% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 112%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 18GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	6.3% Terrible	Read 22 Write 4.72 Mixed 14.1 15% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.72 4K Write 0.39 4K Mixed 0.58 47% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.3% Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 3GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	9.57% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 7.36 Mixed 10.8 14% 13 MB/s	4K Read 4.32 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 1.03 95% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.57% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 2x8GB 328 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	63.8% Good	MC Read 23.5 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 20.4 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 19.7 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Professional Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Professional

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	56x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	36x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	6x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	6x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 59%, 3,839 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	5x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $407

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16