Lenovo 20DKS0FA00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20DKS0FA00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20DKS0FA00
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150202
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '17 at 12:30
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 25.3
2-Core 43.1
31% 42.7 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 152
16% 128 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 503E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4156
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
2.51% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 3.28
2% 3.14 fps
MRender 4.24
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 5.39
3% 3.98 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.51%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JULA1102
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 477
Write 358
Mixed 486
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 13.3
46% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 51.8
DQ Write 67.2
DQ Mixed 20.4
26% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5174BM0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 15.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback