| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150901 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 25 '17 at 19:02 |
| Run Duration | 90 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.8%
Good
|
56% 89.4 Pts
|
36% 295 Pts
|
23% 374 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
EVGA(3842 2678) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.66
|
29.9%
Poor
|
29% 37.4 fps
|
32% 40 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ssd2sc24 0GM2DH16T-T 240GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
64.5%
Good
|
71% 324 MB/s
|
76% 26 MB/s
|
84% 162 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.8%
Below average
|
40% 13.9 GB/s
|
26% 8.93 GB/s
|
56% 71.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 289x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 228x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 70x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 51x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 47x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |