Supermicro SYS-3U12SLKE-SSDJL-OS017

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro SYS-3U12SLKE-SSDJL-OS017  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11SSE-F
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160701
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '17 at 07:01
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 64.4
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 217
61% 116 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 638
62% 509 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 84%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB480G6 480GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G2010140 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 456
Write 433
Mixed 451
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 26.9
91% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 95.7
103% 172 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 98%
Intel SSDSC2BB480G6 480GB
400GB free
Firmware: G2010140 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 465
Write 434
Mixed 447
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 26.6
91% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 107
109% 176 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ADF2G72AZ-2G3A1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.8% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 22.9
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 17.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback