Flytech C56

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemIntel CedarTrail Platform
MotherboardFlytech C56  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '17 at 17:07
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom D2550
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
28.8% Poor
Memory 54.8
1-Core 8
2-Core 13.6
22% 25.5 Pts
4-Core 19.1
8-Core 19.5
3% 19.3 Pts
64-Core 20.7
1% 20.7 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600
Intel(8086 7270)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.8.1089
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 0.69
Parallax 0.56
1% 0.82 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.65%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ADATA_IS32-032GM 32GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN308F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 185
Write 46.7
Mixed 74.5
22% 102 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 5.46
30% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 9.06
DQ Write 17.8
DQ Mixed 5.39
6% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD3SHU2GB1WB-BIG 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 0.6
5% 1.83 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 13%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C56 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Flytech C56

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback