Fujitsu CELSIUS R920

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R920  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory117 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130920
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '17 at 10:59
Run Duration622 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 116
58% 92 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 146
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Palit(1569 1004) 3GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.4% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 53.5
Parallax 69.1
48% 60.5 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 66
Splatting 51.6
49% 61.3 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
776GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 501
Write 396
Mixed 407
97% 435 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 20.8
101% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33
DQ Write 86
DQ Mixed 19.7
26% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 77%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
451GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49% Average
Read 265
Write 210
Mixed 218
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 17
80% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.7
DQ Write 49.6
DQ Mixed 17.5
19% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 49%
Great: 134%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 133
Write 135
Mixed 130
171% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.66
4K Mixed 0.29
104% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 57%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 1TB
273GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.96% Terrible
Read 31.3
Write 1.75
Mixed 2.22
9% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.01
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.007
1% 0.01 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 4.96%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 18
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 12.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.1
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R920 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R920

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback