Asrock H87M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H87M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130503
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '17 at 15:43
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4430-$124 24,837 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 0.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Memory 103 1-Core 7.4 2-Core 16.4 38% 42.3 Pts	4-Core 19 8-Core 26.1 3% 22.5 Pts	64-Core 25.9 2% 25.9 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140 15,701 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 104C) 1GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.53 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Lighting 9.37 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 26.2 8% 15.6 fps	MRender 26.1 Gravity 24.8 Splatting 22.7 20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 361GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2695 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 649 (B1) Unknown 99 99 12 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 45 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 16 (EB) Unknown 99 99 26 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14876662533	36.7% Below average	Read 252 Write 200 Mixed 213 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 19.2 4K Mixed 6.5 43% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 64.8 DQ Write 25.1 DQ Mixed 29.3 26% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 134%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 43GB free Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -4440996168895 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3982 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 307 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 7200 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10878 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10878 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4736	27.8% Poor	Read 192 Write 110 Mixed 152 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 21.1 4K Mixed 6.41 42% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 24.5 DQ Write 36 DQ Mixed 6.21 11% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 61%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 174 8050 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 212 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 379 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 173 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 52 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1251 (C2) HDA temperature 112 104 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	57.3% Above average	Read 103 Write 96 Mixed 92.6 73% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.25 90% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 313GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 173 8133 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 156 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 367 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 116 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 35 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 695 (C2) HDA temperature 113 107 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	47.4% Average	Read 82.4 Write 82.2 Mixed 85.4 63% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 2.06 4K Mixed 0.28 100% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5471-025.A00LF 99P5471-043.A00LF 99P5471-025.A00LF 99P5471-043.A00LF 32GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.6% Below average	MC Read 2.4 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 4.7 10% 3.5 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 0.9 6% 2.03 GB/s	Latency 10.1 396% 10.1 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M Pro4 Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H87M Pro4 - $151

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	27x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	18x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	16x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	23x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	8x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	8x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C7 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 838 samples	8x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	7x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $358

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16