Asus P8Q77-M

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8Q77-M (all builds)
Memory	21.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '17 at 23:19
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 107 2-Core 213 79% 137 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 518 60% 464 Pts	64-Core 517 32% 517 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Nvidia(10DE 104B) 3GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 378.66 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.5% Average	Lighting 55.5 Reflection 47.6 Parallax 61.6 45% 54.9 fps	MRender 65.6 Gravity 61.6 Splatting 45.8 46% 57.7 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 489GB free Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 20 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 15 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 71 37 270583595037 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 1404402345 (F7) Unknown 100 100 43983583 (F8) Unknown 100 100 2209541 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1936 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	78.3% Very good	Read 485 Write 344 Mixed 343 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 22.8 83% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 349 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 43.6 96% 201 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 99%
Samsung PM830 512GB 611 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 370GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM02D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13753 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1226 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 94 94 212 (B2) Unknown 94 94 468 (B3) Unknown 94 94 868 (B4) Unknown 94 94 15260 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 149 (E8) Unknown 94 94 7596 (F1) Unknown 155 155 8746131050 (F2) Unknown 129 129 9874910733	77.4% Very good	Read 480 Write 366 Mixed 439 95% 429 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 75 4K Mixed 19.7 90% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 78 90% 159 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 67 (03) Spinup time 138 138 17197629717 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 726 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10893 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 123 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 968 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 970 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 201864380448 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	101% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 182 Mixed 158 128% 170 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.17 4K Mixed 0.23 95% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 108%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB 7,666 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1TB free Firmware: JKAOA28A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 65537 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 106 (03) Spinup time 165 165 30085939751 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 505 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 40 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 37863 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 484 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1429 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1429 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 227634511906 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	62.5% Good	Read 106 Write 112 Mixed 95.3 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.4 98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 70%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$28 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 264GB free Firmware: GKAOAB0A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 130 130 151 (03) Spinup time 132 132 30090855060 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 928 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 33 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 55002 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 311 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1393 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1393 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 227634184230 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	40.1% Average	Read 73.8 Write 65.6 Mixed 79 55% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.39 104% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 46%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB 4,323 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 108GB free Firmware: JP4ONA01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 148 148 17195467026 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1872 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 28715 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1350 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2195 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2195 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 210454380578 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	47.2% Average	Read 81.8 Write 82.7 Mixed 73.5 60% 79.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.38 90% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 24GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.1 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 18.2 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Q77-M Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Q77-M

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	43x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	23x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	12x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	12x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	6x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	4x

RAM
16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 29%, 6,196 samples	7x
ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,312 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $480

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16