Lenovo 0769ELG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 6%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 0769ELG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO IEL10
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080729
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '17 at 21:59
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 95%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T5750-$99
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Memory 26.2
1-Core 8.1
2-Core 12.1
12% 15.5 Pts
4-Core 17.8
8-Core 12.5
2% 15.1 Pts
64-Core 13.4
1% 13.4 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family
Legend(17AA 383E) 384MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1930
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.15
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.25 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.16%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01G11 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 26.8
Mixed 24
19% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 0.08
4K Mixed 0.08
22% 0.15 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
8.65% Terrible
MC Read 4
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.27 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 1.1
SC Mixed 0.1
1% 0.47 GB/s
Latency 278
14% 278 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.65%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback