Toshiba SATELLITE C50D-A-10P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C50D-A-10P  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD PT10ABX
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '17 at 07:52
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
26.5% Poor
Memory 47.6
1-Core 17.4
2-Core 34.3
24% 33.1 Pts
4-Core 34.3
8-Core 34.3
5% 34.3 Pts
64-Core 34.2
2% 34.2 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Toshiba(1179 FA30) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.102.1.1000
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.75
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1.09
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAC90 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 88.9
Mixed 58.5
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.18
72% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 2.8
7% 2.3 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback