Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '17 at 10:16
Run Duration	361 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 92.9 2-Core 175 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 416 46% 361 Pts	64-Core 449 28% 449 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 3629) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.44 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.07% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 2.31 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.3 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.65 1% 1.62 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.07% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 397GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1045 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 205 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 60 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 24 (F1) Unknown 99 99 260940176	59% Above average	Read 377 Write 224 Mixed 175 57% 258 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 16.3 96% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 39.1 DQ Write 59.4 DQ Mixed 16.2 22% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 123%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 72GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7600 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1973 (B1) Unknown 98 98 19 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 56 23 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 344 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11332304747	52.7% Above average	Read 230 Write 158 Mixed 151 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 19.9 107% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 41.9 DQ Write 61.5 DQ Mixed 19.9 24% 41.1 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 310GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 51331728 (03) Spinup time 100 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4338 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 4644485788 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9588 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3516 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 21475164167 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 53 537853984 (C2) HDA temperature 32 47 55834574880 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 58 35 51331728 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -42631845370583 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2286333009 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3714916343	68.2% Good	Read 120 Write 119 Mixed 24.7 64% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 0.34 77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 88%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 184GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 173 2208 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8568 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9600 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2390 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 320 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8247 (C2) HDA temperature 110 94 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	69% Good	Read 127 Write 113 Mixed 81.3 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.97 4K Mixed 0.29 122% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 104%
Maxtor 6Y080M0 82GB-$60 722 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 16GB free Firmware: YAR51HW0 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 225 225 5791 (04) Start/Stop count 247 247 12800 (05) Reallocated sector count 242 237 120 (06) Read channel margin 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 238 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 233 40110 (09) Power-on hours count 189 189 32871 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 237 237 6578 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 46 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 250 13593 (C4) Reallocation count 87 87 166 (C5) Current pending sector count 242 238 112 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 1 1 1710 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 199 0 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 252 5 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 103 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 250 2 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 244 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 252 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 194 145 0 (63) Unknown 253 253 0 (64) Unknown 253 253 0 (65) Unknown 253 253 0	18% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 32.6 Mixed 19 20% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.31 75% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 32%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 320GB 1,223 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 245GB free, PID 2100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 30 Write 24.8 Mixed 9.93 25% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.16 4K Mixed 0.29 51% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 18%
Toshiba StorE HDD 500GB 390 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 203GB free, PID 0b15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 25.4 Mixed 10.4 26% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.17 18% 0.29 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 19%
Seagate FreeAgent 500GB 796 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 89GB free, PID 3001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 23.9 Mixed 10.2 25% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.32 55% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMY16GX3M2A1 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1 029E CMY16GX3M2A1 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 16.1 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	9x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	7x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	4x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	4x

SSD
120GB 120GBRescue08rm22ar120hyBench 60%, 9 samples	5x
Extreme Pro 240GBSanDisk $79Bench 92%, 10,862 samples	5x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	3x

RAM
FLFF65F-C8KL9 4x4GBKingmaxBench 49%, 72 samples	5x
M378B5273DH0 4x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 61 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 26 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $342

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16