Lenovo 2689GPG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemLenovo 2689GPG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G580
Memory1.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120816
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '17 at 01:20
Run Duration97 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2328M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 46
1-Core 46.3
2-Core 81.8
35% 58 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 118
17% 124 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 1.87
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 1.34
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.74
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 503
Write 420
Mixed 463
103% 462 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 18.1
82% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 86
DQ Mixed 26.7
29% 45.6 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3150ED58E8W1600 0443 RMT3160ED58E9W1600 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback