Fujitsu CELSIUS R670

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R670 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2618-B1
Memory	37.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 10 '17 at 17:34
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon W5590 170 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Memory 93 1-Core 90.2 2-Core 176 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 447 51% 397 Pts	64-Core 852 53% 852 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 375.63 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Lighting 40.9 Reflection 40.7 Parallax 40.2 33% 40.6 fps	MRender 51 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 39.7 34% 42.7 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 21,747 User benchmarks, average bench 219% 222GB free Firmware: CXZ7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 1,431 Write 1,148 Mixed 1,239 283% 1,273 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 25.8 96% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 38.4 DQ Write 95.1 DQ Mixed 25 31% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 134% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 292%
Samsung MZ7WD240HAFV-00003 240GB 153 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM87W3Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3247 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1546 (B1) Unknown 99 99 29 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 5248 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 57 24 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 726 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7155985588	45.9% Average	Read 267 Write 241 Mixed 248 56% 252 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 52.7 4K Mixed 13.8 63% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 12 DQ Write 55 DQ Mixed 10.1 15% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 93%
LSI MegaSR 897GB 765GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

LSI MegaSR 2TB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 700GB free Firmware: 1.0 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 139 Write 74.9 Mixed 81.5 74% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 0.32 4K Mixed 0.23 50% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12x4GB 970 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 12 of 12 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 10 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R670 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R670

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E55301stBench 60%, 771 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	2x
Xeon W5590IntelBench 72%, 257 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples	2x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	1x
Quadro FX 4800NvidiaBench 6%, 2,114 samples	1x

SSD
SP900 256GBAdata $300Bench 74%, 9,430 samples	2x
SUV400S 240GBKingstonBench 64%, 497 samples	2x
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $114Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	1x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	2x
8x4GBUnknownBench 90%, 5,222 samples	2x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $300

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16