Asus H81M-D

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	67.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus H81M-D (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680x1050x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140220
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '17 at 05:29
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 83.7 1-Core 120 2-Core 227 81% 144 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 602 64% 509 Pts	64-Core 603 37% 603 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2352 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Lighting 84.6 Reflection 83.7 Parallax 73.7 69% 80.7 fps	MRender 85.8 Gravity 78 Splatting 76.6 65% 80.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2489 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 692 (B1) Unknown 98 98 32 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 45 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 45 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13416519707	73.2% Very good	Read 492 Write 399 Mixed 411 97% 434 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 17.5 90% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 80.5 DQ Mixed 18 24% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 124%
WD RE4 250GB (2010)-$33 1,397 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 189GB free Firmware: 01.01S02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 42 (03) Spinup time 136 134 4175 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2549 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 8848 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2523 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 437 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2111 (C2) HDA temperature 110 81 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	75% Very good	Read 125 Write 136 Mixed 124 97% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.25 4K Write 2.91 4K Mixed 0.54 166% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB 27,462 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	58.7% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 17.2 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 18.8 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-D Builds (Compare 821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-D

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	145x
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	80x
Core i3-4160Intel $79Bench 55%, 48,506 samples	67x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	81x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	78x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	72x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	38x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x
S800 240GBRamstaBench 57%, 1,330 samples	17x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	27x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	16x
99U5584-005.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 4,897 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16