LG 13ZD940-GX58K

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 69% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	LG 13ZD940-GX58K (all builds)
Motherboard	LG White Tip Mountain
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140327
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '17 at 09:33
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	19%
CPU Throttled	69%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281 64,450 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 86.8 1-Core 69.8 2-Core 120 58% 92.4 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 158 23% 168 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1854 0198) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.94% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 4.19 Parallax 5.22 3% 4.2 fps	MRender 4.24 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.15 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.94% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_M600_MTFDDAY256MBF 256GB 563 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 18 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 20 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 8 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1922 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 43 37 270584774713 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 442110011 (F7) Unknown 100 100 13843781 (F8) Unknown 100 100 4121660	83.3% Excellent	Read 497 Write 380 Mixed 410 95% 429 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 26.4 100% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 64.7 90% 166 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 111%
dr.save Ext.HDD 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 140GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.2% Below average	Read 87.7 Write 90.8 Mixed 58.8 100% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.18 58% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 37%
USB Flash Disk 16GB 2,340 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 3GB free, PID null Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 17.6 Mixed 15.3 23% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.49 4K Write 0.62 4K Mixed 0.52 52% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 1x8GB 19,744 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 8.4 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 9.3 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

LG 13ZD940-GX58K

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)