Samsung 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 x 65536 colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '17 at 04:13
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B940
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 93.7
48% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 97.5
8-Core 99.5
13% 98.5 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 51%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$90
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AJ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 48.2
Write 42.1
Mixed 49.4
35% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.008
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.03
14% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.1
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.3
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $253
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback