Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '17 at 17:36
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 193
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 547
52% 432 Pts
64-Core 708
44% 708 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088
EVGA(3842 2791) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 373.6
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Lighting 62.1
Reflection 59
Parallax 75.3
51% 65.5 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 50.3
49% 61.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 379
Write 394
Mixed 191
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 32.1
115% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 150
135% 208 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 124%
Corsair Force GT 240GB-$499
213GB free
Firmware: 5.03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 514
Write 254
Mixed 314
79% 361 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 15.4
86% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 62.8
99% 190 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 92%
Corsair Force LS 240GB-$110
67GB free
Firmware: S8FM07.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.8% Average
Read 262
Write 250
Mixed 255
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 8.62
56% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 24.5
54% 110 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
915GB free
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 150
Mixed 147
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.31
105% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
823GB free
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 98.1
Write 96.2
Mixed 96.8
73% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.37
85% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 70%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
124GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 73.6
Write 64.5
Mixed 79.1
55% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.47
121% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 29.7
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $896
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback