Asrock Q1900-ITX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Q1900-ITX (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141031
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '17 at 14:12
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1900 6,116 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	39% Below average	Memory 64.5 1-Core 21.6 2-Core 42.4 31% 42.8 Pts	4-Core 81.7 8-Core 78.2 11% 79.9 Pts	64-Core 79.3 5% 79.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 0F31) 2.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 0.97 Reflection 1.23 Parallax 1 1% 1.07 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 318GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 18304 (03) Spinup time 100 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 707 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 4398917239 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3758 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 664 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 2 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 54 437387290 (C2) HDA temperature 26 46 68719476762 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 63 39 18304 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -21620865364293 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4102609640 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2979798018	60.1% Good	Read 106 Write 104 Mixed 90.6 75% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.27 57% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS545032B9SA00 320GB 1,154 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 294GB free Firmware: PB3OC64G Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 140 140 90194313218 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 3874 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 41 41 26223 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2654 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 29491263 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 25 25 757040 (C2) HDA temperature 239 239 193274314775 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	42.3% Average	Read 68.8 Write 78.5 Mixed 71.5 55% 73 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.32 81% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 43%
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24 4,798 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 91GB free Firmware: 3.18 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 60 52 155659305 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1561 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 730743520 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 20021 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2715 (C2) HDA temperature 30 51 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 60 52 155659305 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 18 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	25.2% Poor	Read 41.3 Write 45.9 Mixed 44.7 33% 44 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.41 99% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905469-063.A00LF 2x4GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.3% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 9.2 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q1900-ITX Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Q1900-ITX

CPU
Celeron J1900IntelBench 34%, 6,116 samples	43x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	43x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	4x
Solid State Disk 60GBSpccBench 52%, 2,308 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	5x
CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GBCrucialBench 38%, 4,853 samples	4x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16