Intel BasinFalls CRB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 7 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Intel BasinFalls HEDT platform (SKL-X)
Motherboard	Intel BasinFalls CRB (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 02 '17 at 22:27
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Single core	Quad core	Multi core
Intel Core i9-7900X (pre-release sample) CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	96.2% Outstanding	SC Int 105 SC Float 105 SC Mixed 110 86% 107 Pts	QC Int 427 QC Float 441 QC Mixed 434 98% 434 Pts	MC Int 1,344 MC Float 1,588 MC Mixed 1,469 219% 1,467 Pts

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400 1,778 User benchmarks - Average bench 1% PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.41% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 4.8 1% 4.3 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 3.2 2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.41% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 64GB-$158 2,015 User benchmarks - Average bench 49% 27GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 812 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 12054 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 96 96 148 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 4488248820634 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 48 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 32 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 8 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 96 96 4 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	46.4% Average	Read 415 Write 107 Mixed 170 50% 231 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 52.2 4K Mixed 5.82 66% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 77.1 DQ Mixed 12.2 35% 76.6 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 58%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB 827 User benchmarks - Average bench 9% 3GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	5.87% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 8.6 Mixed 9.14 14% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.14 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 16% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.87% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 14,008 User benchmarks - Average bench 29% 1 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 6.5 26% 8.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 5.3 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 92.3 43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical BasinFalls CRB Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 63%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Intel BasinFalls CRB

CPU
Core i9-7900X (pre-release sample)IntelBench 96%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 5400ATIBench 1%, 1,778 samples	1x

SSD
M4 64GBCrucial $158Bench 49%, 2,015 samples	1x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 29%, 14,008 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309	Nvidia GTX 1070 $390	Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i5-7600K $231	AMD RX 480 $608	Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $135
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280	Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $248	Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $167

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $34
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $40	HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $133	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13