| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140403 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 31 '17 at 02:14 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.6%
Above average
|
56% 91.9 Pts
|
32% 246 Pts
|
19% 303 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 3768) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 361.43
|
29.2%
Poor
|
29% 35.2 fps
|
30% 37.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
84.5%
Excellent
|
90% 406 MB/s
|
109% 42.1 MB/s
|
107% 201 MB/s
|
|
|
103%
Outstanding
|
98% 438 MB/s
|
158% 53.7 MB/s
|
110% 184 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS4G3D169DS3.16FK 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
40.6%
Average
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
28% 9.73 GB/s
|
49% 81.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 379x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 82x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 44x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 43x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 29x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $729 |