Asus P6T DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus P6T DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20100921
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '17 at 19:27
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5660 6,950 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Memory 94.2 1-Core 110 2-Core 221 81% 142 Pts	4-Core 442 8-Core 657 68% 549 Pts	64-Core 785 49% 785 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.7.3 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.5% Below average	Lighting 44.4 Reflection 68.6 Parallax 72.1 36% 61.7 fps	MRender 67.6 Gravity 47 Splatting 55.4 46% 56.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso 128GB 128GB 1,805 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: O0213E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 405 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 972 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 252 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 131 (A4) Unknown 100 100 2558219 (A5) Unknown 100 100 653 (A6) Unknown 100 100 593 (A7) Unknown 100 100 645 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 619 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 11 (F1) Unknown 100 100 51515 (F2) Unknown 100 100 80216	50.5% Above average	Read 370 Write 162 Mixed 223 55% 252 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 59.3 4K Mixed 3.21 72% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 18.8 46% 98.4 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 571GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 170 2291 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 310 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 152 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 298 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 173 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 304 (C2) HDA temperature 115 100 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	73.8% Very good	Read 128 Write 129 Mixed 115 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.35 4K Mixed 0.34 136% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 109%
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB 10,566 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 34GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1491 (03) Spinup time 188 187 1583 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3193 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7118 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3076 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 926 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 168 168 97223 (C2) HDA temperature 122 94 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4272 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	26.4% Poor	Read 48 Write 43.7 Mixed 48 35% 46.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.37 90% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 32%
Intenso Ultra Line 32GB 171 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 25GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	31.3% Below average	Read 124 Write 43.7 Mixed 45.2 75% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.17 4K Write 0.83 4K Mixed 0.67 70% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	41.2% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 13.4 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 59.3 67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6T DELUXE Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T DELUXE

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	211x
Core i7 940Intel $79Bench 66%, 2,107 samples	27x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	22x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	17x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	16x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	13x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	12x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	70x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	36x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16