Gigabyte GA-P75-D3

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P75-D3 (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120821
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '17 at 15:24
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Memory 93.5 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 191 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 373 50% 372 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BC) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Lighting 21.8 Reflection 16.9 Parallax 19.9 18% 19.5 fps	MRender 25.2 Gravity 22.8 Splatting 16.6 17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5204 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1552 (B1) Unknown 97 97 62 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 57 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 5 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13065135294	81.9% Excellent	Read 507 Write 404 Mixed 413 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 62 4K Mixed 19.1 106% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 76.8 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 90.3 81% 118 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 115%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 137GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 137 131 4133 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4728 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 14157 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3685 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 49 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 133 133 201509 (C2) HDA temperature 115 104 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61% Good	Read 105 Write 107 Mixed 103 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 2.37 4K Mixed 0.25 94% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 79%
Toshiba MK1255GSX H 120GB 1,072 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1GB free Firmware: FG001Q Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 993 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 9861 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 8207 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4612 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 29 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 1231 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 36507 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 201864445981 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 69 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 729 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 335 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	21.1% Poor	Read 37 Write 36.3 Mixed 44.8 30% 39.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.24 57% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB 37,489 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 10.3 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9.2 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P75-D3 Builds (Compare 454 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P75-D3

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	90x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	65x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	36x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	29x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	7x
A3-1GU64B1-12C 04CB 16GBUnknownBench 59%, 12 samples	7x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16