Fujitsu AMILO Ui 3520

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu AMILO Ui 3520  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU CW0A0___
Memory0.2 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '17 at 09:30
Run Duration351 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N270
U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 4.6
2-Core 4
2% 4.3 Pts
4-Core 6.2
8-Core 7.7
1% 6.95 Pts
64-Core 9.1
1% 9.1 Pts
Poor: 12% Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK6028GAL 60GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BN101A Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 27.8
Mixed 12.6
17% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.22
56% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.68% Terrible
Read 18.4
Write 5.48
Mixed 6.47
10% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.39
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.01
13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.68%
Great: 8%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback