Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3740 1,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Memory 45.4 1-Core 12.5 2-Core 25.1 21% 27.7 Pts	4-Core 41.4 8-Core 47.2 6% 44.3 Pts	64-Core 42.2 3% 42.2 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 084C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.75% Terrible	Lighting 0.73 Reflection 0.96 Parallax 0.78 1% 0.83 fps	MRender 1.71 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.48 1% 1.28 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.75% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MBG4GC 31GB 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.3 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18% Very poor	Read 157 Write 50.4 Mixed 81 21% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 10.1 4K Mixed 4.13 26% 8.23 MB/s	DQ Read 30.9 DQ Write 14.7 DQ Mixed 4.52 8% 16.7 MB/s

Generic SD Card 32GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 6GB free Firmware: 0.2 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 22.7 Write 14.1 Mixed 13.8 13% 16.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.61 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.51 310% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
To be filled by O.E.M be filled by O.E.M 2x1GB 291 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 4.9 14% 4.9 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.87 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16