Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8120 25,690 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Memory 57.5 1-Core 50.5 2-Core 108 43% 72.1 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 332 34% 273 Pts	64-Core 82 5% 82 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Palit(1569 0F00) 1GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 372.90 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.88% Terrible	Lighting 4.87 Reflection 5.38 Parallax 3.75 4% 4.67 fps	MRender 5.76 Gravity 4.87 Splatting 3.43 4% 4.69 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.88% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 380GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA50E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 94 786442 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 92 (03) Spinup time 117 117 12897681603 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2146 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3776 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1803 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2148 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2148 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 180389609499 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	62% Good	Read 103 Write 113 Mixed 119 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.28 70% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 77%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 772 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 895GB free, PID ce17 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 22.2 Write 22 Mixed 8.59 21% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.38 58% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 8GB 364 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 333, 333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 9.6 24% 8.53 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 5.8 12% 4.2 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	13x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	10x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	7x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	3x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $203

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16