ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Default Default string
Motherboard	AMI Aptio CRB
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '17 at 00:39
Run Duration	296 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3150 3,131 User benchmarks, average bench 26% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Memory 39 1-Core 20.5 2-Core 41.2 22% 33.6 Pts	4-Core 81.3 8-Core 82.7 11% 82 Pts	64-Core 83.2 5% 83.2 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4300 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.63% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 2.5 1% 2.24 fps	MRender 2.52 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 3 2% 2.44 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.63% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KingFast 256GB 4,532 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 222GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1026A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 9 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 41 (A3) Unknown 100 100 28 (A4) Unknown 100 100 190 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 70 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 15 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1178 (F2) Unknown 100 100 190 (F5) Unknown 100 100 1520	54.2% Above average	Read 448 Write 273 Mixed 366 80% 363 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 12.7 61% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 16.8 DQ Write 40.5 DQ Mixed 13.9 15% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 130%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 6545, Kingston Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.41% Terrible	Read 26.6 Write 4.07 Mixed 5.98 11% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.78 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.004 11% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.41% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.3% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 6.6 22% 7.53 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 207 19% 207 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback