Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570 2,341 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 80.7 2-Core 162 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 476 50% 400 Pts	64-Core 823 51% 823 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3700 1,068 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 055F) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 331.65 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	5.47% Terrible	Lighting 7.37 Reflection 7.38 Parallax 2.38 6% 5.71 fps	MRender 6.38 Gravity 5.47 Splatting 4.74 4% 5.53 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.47% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair CSSD-F240GB2-A 240GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4468738 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -80977313396070 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 541 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 37 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 55 17183473694 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 4468738 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1088 (EA) Unknown 0 0 704 (F1) Unknown 0 0 704 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1664	44.9% Average	Read 234 Write 92.2 Mixed 128 33% 151 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 15.9 82% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 94.1 DQ Mixed 39.2 53% 99.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 51%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB 4,330 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 113GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 33 Write 23.1 Mixed 9.21 25% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.35 4K Write 0.81 4K Mixed 0.77 66% 1.64 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 98 9965434-110.A00LF 50GB 1333 MHz 16384, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.1% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 5.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.37 GB/s	Latency 75.1 53% 75.1 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	179x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16