Asus X99-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E  (all builds)
Memory57 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160512
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateJan 20 '17 at 02:18
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 218
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 748
74% 602 Pts
64-Core 923
57% 923 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1625 MHz, MLim: 1965 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.5% Good
Lighting 75.4
Reflection 79
Parallax 70.1
61% 74.8 fps
MRender 82.1
Gravity 72
Splatting 64.2
59% 72.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 1,477
Write 1,044
Mixed 1,264
280% 1,262 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 52
199% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 118
141% 250 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 198%
Great: 283%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
61GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 495
Write 342
Mixed 352
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 24.4
122% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 72.9
97% 178 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 118%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 156
Write 151
Mixed 142
113% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.35
125% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
42GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 41.8
Write 39.8
Mixed 27.7
46% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 7.96
4K Mixed 4.28
449% 7.04 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 47
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 46.9
131% 45.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 22.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 119%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $603
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback