Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 93.6 1-Core 108 2-Core 215 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 518 53% 428 Pts	64-Core 516 32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680MX 279 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Apple(106B 010D) 2GB CLim: 719 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 365.10 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	22% Poor	Lighting 27.3 Reflection 25.1 Parallax 34.3 22% 28.9 fps	MRender 34 Gravity 23.3 Splatting 23 21% 26.8 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 23%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 29GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 26.6 Write 10.4 Mixed 12.6 18% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.49 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.67 89% 1.91 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.2% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 17.4 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.1 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 60.8 66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16