Asus Z8P(N)E-D12(X)

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Z8P(N)E-D12(X) (all builds)
Memory	17.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '17 at 18:34
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon W5580 264 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 66 1-Core 86.9 2-Core 167 61% 107 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 549 54% 442 Pts	64-Core 860 53% 860 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Asus(1043 8390) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 347.88 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Lighting 22 Reflection 25.8 Parallax 19.8 18% 22.5 fps	MRender 27.4 Gravity 23.3 Splatting 23.7 20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 103GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 445 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 177 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 64 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2134405259	40.4% Average	Read 178 Write 156 Mixed 148 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 36.5 4K Mixed 17.2 73% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 31.5 DQ Write 49.8 DQ Mixed 17.3 20% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 115%
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89 9,651 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10302 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3662 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1049 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 19 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 146779 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 1075 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 48 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 219761 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 146779 (F2) Unknown 100 100 138973	34.4% Below average	Read 199 Write 130 Mixed 104 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 13.8 56% 20 MB/s	DQ Read 18.2 DQ Write 41.6 DQ Mixed 11.9 14% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 48%
WD WD1200BEVS-60UST0 120GB 3,683 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 32GB free Firmware: 01.06M01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 190 188 1500 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2641 (05) Reallocated sector count 190 190 76 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4452 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2219 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 2169 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 175 175 76312 (C2) HDA temperature 123 86 24 (C4) Reallocation count 196 196 4 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	19.3% Very poor	Read 35.4 Write 31.6 Mixed 31 25% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.26 62% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5x4GB 1,432 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 5 of 12 slots used 20GB DIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 10.8 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.7 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z8P(N)E-D12(X) Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 69%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus Z8P(N)E-D12(X)

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon E55201stBench 58%, 2,226 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56801stBench 71%, 2,389 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	4x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	2x
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples	1x

SSD
T253TD480G 480GBTeamBench 100%, 1,366 samples	2x
240GB 240GBAcclamatorBench 68%, 53 samples	2x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	2x

RAM
6x8GBUnknownBench 53%, 2,890 samples	2x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	2x
12x4GBUnknownBench 52%, 970 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $299

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16