Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 PRO (all builds)
Memory	17.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '17 at 02:34
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 92.8 2-Core 183 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 458 52% 405 Pts	64-Core 465 29% 465 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 367A) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.70 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Lighting 68.8 Reflection 67.9 Parallax 60.6 56% 65.8 fps	MRender 73.2 Gravity 64.2 Splatting 56 52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 132GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13156 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 454 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 42 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 34 (F1) Unknown 99 99 14336119151	90.6% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 409 Mixed 421 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 60.4 4K Mixed 27.2 114% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 103 114% 194 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8427 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 365 (B1) Unknown 98 98 31 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 52 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 24 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24535704639	85.8% Excellent	Read 504 Write 401 Mixed 416 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 77 4K Mixed 22.8 122% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 37.5 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 22.1 46% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 33GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19572 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 644 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 43 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 98 98 1867 (EB) Unknown 99 99 75 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11993495582	58.8% Above average	Read 260 Write 178 Mixed 184 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 22.6 101% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 78.5 82% 136 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 126%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323 4,113 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 98GB free Firmware: 01.01L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 145 135 11725 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4068 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 23776 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 748 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 79 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3988 (C2) HDA temperature 109 95 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	46.4% Average	Read 78.2 Write 82.9 Mixed 81.3 61% 80.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.94 4K Mixed 0.56 145% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 93%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 64GB-$13 1,615 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 17GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.14% Terrible	Read 32.8 Write 3.89 Mixed 13.1 16% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.63 4K Write 0.62 4K Mixed 0.47 47% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.14% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CML16GX3M2A1600C10 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	48.5% Average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 15.3 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,037 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	458x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	286x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	100x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	112x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	71x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	57x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	41x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	42x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	29x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $849

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16