User System

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	GBT___ GBTUACPI
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA770-DS3
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100913
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '17 at 14:45
Run Duration	276 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9750 1,906 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Memory 75.2 1-Core 35.3 2-Core 71.2 41% 60.6 Pts	4-Core 136 8-Core 139 18% 138 Pts	64-Core 133 8% 133 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Sapphire(174B E348) CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.10.3 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Lighting 26.1 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 33.6 21% 30.6 fps	MRender 30.5 Gravity 25.1 Splatting 34.2 25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3309 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3050 (B1) Unknown 90 90 92 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 57 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 34 (EB) Unknown 99 99 74 (F1) Unknown 99 99 588501270	39.6% Below average	Read 243 Write 78.1 Mixed 124 32% 148 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 49.5 4K Mixed 9.25 72% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 69.1 DQ Mixed 18.7 36% 73.8 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 73%
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB 8,252 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 415GB free Firmware: CC37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 108753818 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 13060 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 34030126 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 5055 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6401 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 76 76 24 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 96 146031116645 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 49 537722909 (C2) HDA temperature 29 51 42949672989 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 38 27 108753818 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 13 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 134595685140623 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1870316692 (F2) Unknown 100 253 853884801	66.4% Good	Read 116 Write 115 Mixed 113 86% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.51 121% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 71%
Maxtor STM3500320AS 500GB 5,105 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 465GB free Firmware: MX1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 34578854 (03) Spinup time 98 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8308 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 23 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 4437895489 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8386 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 25 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7626 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BC) Unknown 100 93 5854131457998 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 47 554500126 (C2) HDA temperature 30 53 34359738398 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 28 22 34578854 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	53% Above average	Read 90.7 Write 93.9 Mixed 84.1 67% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.39 109% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB 822 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 13GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Read 131 Write 7.41 Mixed 7.81 37% 48.7 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.001 44% 3.98 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.7% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 9.7 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 6.6 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 90 44% 90 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)