Lenovo 90FL002SMW

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Lenovo 90FL002SMW (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 364A
Memory	1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160823
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '17 at 07:24
Run Duration	107 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	93%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Memory 58.6 1-Core 89.8 2-Core 110 52% 86.3 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 219 30% 220 Pts	64-Core 312 19% 312 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3470) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.3% Very good	Lighting 94.5 Reflection 112 Parallax 93.9 77% 100 fps	MRender 96.1 Gravity 91.1 Splatting 97.2 78% 94.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 88%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000L1 256GB 2,045 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT03L0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 15 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 11 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 1 (AE) Unknown 99 99 5 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1709 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 53 201864511530 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 16756243 (F1) Unknown 99 99 202 (F2) Unknown 99 99 176 (F9) Unknown 99 99 256	64.7% Good	Read 453 Write 155 Mixed 243 62% 284 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 21.4 91% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 51 82% 160 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB 7,085 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 9.4 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 2.9 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 90FL002SMW Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

System: Lenovo 90FL002SMW

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	52x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	2x
Core i5-6600Intel $132Bench 68%, 80,688 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x

SSD
MZ7LN256HCHP-000L1 256GBSamsungBench 86%, 413 samples	13x
LCH-256V2S 256GBLiteonBench 78%, 2,710 samples	9x
MZ7TY256HDHP-000L1 256GBSamsungBench 90%, 2,045 samples	6x

RAM
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,085 samples	26x
RMUA5110MB78HAF2400 1x8GBRamaxelBench 39%, 1,049 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 121% - Outstanding

Total price: $211

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16