Lenovo 25373V9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 25373V9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 25373V9
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '17 at 22:48
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 143
56% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 181
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M
Legend(17AA 2142) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 312.69
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2.09
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KF480H6L 480GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.8% Average
Read 228
Write 216
Mixed 224
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 16
54% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 50.7
59% 102 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5773DH0-CH9 0198 99U5428-046.A00LF 6GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.8% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.4
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback