| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120521 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 03 '17 at 00:06 |
| Run Duration | 98 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.6%
Average
|
46% 69.9 Pts
|
12% 93.4 Pts
|
6% 93.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.12.2
|
23%
Poor
|
22% 31.4 fps
|
25% 29.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
35% 47.2 MB/s
|
56% 0.46 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.6%
Poor
|
26% 9.17 GB/s
|
21% 7.2 GB/s
|
47% 84.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 960GM/U3S3 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX - $131
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 40x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 7x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
| GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples | 4x |
| R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 102% - Outstanding | Total price: $247 |