HCD G2 Mini PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHCD G2 Mini PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHCD Tablet
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160420
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 30 '16 at 18:18
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3735F
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 15
2-Core 30
27% 35.3 Pts
4-Core 58.9
8-Core 58.9
8% 58.9 Pts
64-Core 59.2
4% 59.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 0F31) 1,024MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.78
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.15 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MBG4GC 31GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.2
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.8% Poor
Read 163
Write 73.9
Mixed 80.8
23% 106 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 3.88
43% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 20.6
DQ Mixed 2.98
6% 12.8 MB/s
Generic SD32G SD Card 31GB
28GB free
Firmware: 3.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
9.88% Terrible
Read 22.4
Write 9.99
Mixed 12.6
11% 15 MB/s
4K Read 6.08
4K Write 0.27
4K Mixed 0.03
261% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.88%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
20.1% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6.3
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.87 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback