HP EliteBook 8560w

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8560w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1631
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160525
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '16 at 11:41
Run Duration	364 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230 4,929 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 172 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 414 46% 362 Pts	64-Core 410 25% 410 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000M 3,227 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 1631) 2GB CLim: 550 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.66% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 7.85 Parallax 5.5 6% 6.68 fps	MRender 8.05 Gravity 6.9 Splatting 7.3 6% 7.42 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.66% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5990 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2791 (B1) Unknown 87 87 147 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 53 45 47 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 139 (F1) Unknown 99 99 54876458284	61.5% Good	Read 495 Write 342 Mixed 334 86% 390 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 29.1 4K Mixed 13.6 65% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 35.6 DQ Mixed 57.5 36% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 108%
Toshiba MK3261GSYN 320GB-$72 6,986 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 129GB free Firmware: MH000C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1225 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3347 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 21 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 3858 (0A) Spinup retry count 166 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2637 (B7) Unknown 100 100 109 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 27 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 49 689569830 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 122 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5177423 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 41932 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 6 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	54% Above average	Read 95.4 Write 92.6 Mixed 93.9 71% 94 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.3 85% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 64%
Kingston DataTraveler GE9 8GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	4.41% Terrible	Read 17.9 Write 2.71 Mixed 6.56 9% 9.06 MB/s	4K Read 5.12 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.005 19% 1.71 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.41% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.6 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8560w Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8560w

CPU
Core i7-2820QMIntel $230Bench 59%, 4,929 samples	91x
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	77x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	64x

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	287x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	126x
FirePro M5950 AMDBench 5%, 1,394 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	189x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	63x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16