Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141202
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '16 at 07:26
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 74.1 2-Core 138 63% 101 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 226 30% 226 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% MSI(1462 231B) 3GB CLim: 720 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	6.16% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 8.27 Parallax 5.22 6% 6.8 fps	MRender 8.9 Gravity 6.87 Splatting 10.1 7% 8.62 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.16% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32070RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 609 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 97 (A5) Unknown 100 100 1357236863376 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 4 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 35 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 57 50 214748364843 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 571233730693 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 397 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1876 (F1) Unknown 253 253 844 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1014 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	25.2% Poor	Read 231 Write 99.9 Mixed 131 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 6.32 4K Mixed 0.33 37% 9.57 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 78%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB 19,716 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 315GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 64 (03) Spinup time 131 126 6433 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5475 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 17820 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5213 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 551 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5475 (C2) HDA temperature 118 82 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 8 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	36.9% Below average	Read 65.1 Write 63.1 Mixed 63 48% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.34 92% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 49%
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$90 12,451 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 152GB free Firmware: 2AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 89 89 3402 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7728 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4391 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 98 98 2278 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 840 (B5) Unknown 99 99 22586880 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1244 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 60 193274576923 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 6483 (DF) Load/unload retry count 98 98 2278 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 62 62 383885	49.8% Average	Read 82.2 Write 91.3 Mixed 82.4 64% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.26 70% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	48.2% Average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 17.5 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 13.4 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	508x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	325x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	185x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	127x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	90x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	85x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	56x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	355x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	346x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	309x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16