Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 115% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 115% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	70.3 GB free of 80 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150930
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '16 at 00:42
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Memory 91.1 1-Core 139 2-Core 277 93% 169 Pts	4-Core 551 8-Core 996 93% 774 Pts	64-Core 1455 90% 1455 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 370E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Lighting 155 Reflection 162 Parallax 150 126% 156 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 149 Splatting 114 103% 128 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 1.5TB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7495 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 73 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 65 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 40 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6327937915	98.9% Outstanding	Read 526 Write 417 Mixed 423 101% 455 MB/s	4K Read 44.7 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 32 165% 60.9 MB/s	DQ Read 44.2 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 155 97% 105 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 135%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 894GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 28729 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 177 (B1) Unknown 97 97 33 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 60 23 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 141 (F1) Unknown 99 99 60085854941	76.4% Very good	Read 505 Write 114 Mixed 247 63% 288 MB/s	4K Read 44 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 23.6 135% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 101 108% 181 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 126%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 458GB free Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	267% Outstanding	Read 2,320 Write 1,478 Mixed 1,574 396% 1,791 MB/s	4K Read 52.8 4K Write 179 4K Mixed 58.9 250% 96.8 MB/s	DQ Read 55.1 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 232 166% 202 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 267% Great: 283%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550 8,641 User benchmarks, average bench 186% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: 8EV10135 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68.8% Good	Read 186 Write 186 Mixed 186 42% 186 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 28 157% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 38 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 27.4 38% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 230%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 2800 2OZ DDR4 2800 2OZ DDR4 2800 2OZ DDR4 2800 2OZ DDR4 2800 2OZ DDR4 2800 2OZ DDR4 2800 2OZ DDR4 2800 2OZ 80GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 4096, 16384, 4096, 16384, 4096, 16384, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	113% Outstanding	MC Read 47.9 MC Write 42.1 MC Mixed 41.3 125% 43.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 22.8 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	762x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	194x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	114x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16