PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus Rampage Formula (all builds) |
Memory | 6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100311 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 15 '16 at 20:25 |
Run Duration | 278 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 34% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
41.1%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.11.4
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
36.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
20.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 36x |
Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples | 34x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 12x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 7x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $248 |